The Science of Life

In all of the physical sciences, there is a high need to be analytical.  After all, being analytical is how we know with scientific certainty that what we hypothesize and theorize is legitimately true. In a way, the physical sciences have an advantage in the analytical realm that the life sciences and social sciences don't have; it is exceedingly easier to get pull numbers out of experiments in the physical sciences than in either of the other two types of sciences.  After all, the life and social sciences have too many variables which can not be controlled for, for one reason or another.  After all, in economics (a social science), it is immoral to make some people be in poverty while making others financially prosper for any reason, much less to get numbers for analytics.  It is also immoral in medical science (a life science) to infect one group with disease while keeping others disease free for any reason, much less to get numbers for analytics.  So...

Hello, and welcome to the Organic Chemistry lecture series by The Science of Life.  Today, I’ll be covering some basic definitions which will be necessary for the rest of the course. To begin, what is Organic chemistry?  To put it simply, it is the chemistry of the compounds which contain carbon.  There are some definitions which exclude the most oxidized of these compounds, such as CFC’s in old school aerosols, Teflon, and carbon dioxide, but for the purposes of this course, these severely oxidized compounds of carbon will not be considered, so for all practical purposes in this course, these two definitions incorporate the same set of compounds covered in this course. Everything in this course, though, falls under the definition of the word chemical, which are substances which, in their pure form, contain the atomic nucleus of one or more element.  This means everything from glucose to fructose, from vitamin C to cyanide, from proteins to aluminum fall un...

Hello Internet, and Welcome to the Organic Chemistry Lecture Series by The Science of Life.  This is the first lecture, so let’s start off at the beginning.  That means let’s start off with the synthesis of the units of chemistry in mother nature, well before either the Earth or Humans were even ever a thing. The Big Bang happened 14.7 billion years ago.  This was the first instance of space, energy, and time in our universe.  It’s where the universe itself banged into existence.  What caused it is a mystery; nobody knows how it happened. Notice what was missing from the list: matter.  In the very first seconds of the universe, there was no matter in the universe.  Everything in the universe was on the energy side of the  equation.  After a few minutes of cooling, the energy finally became cool enough (and therefor cool enough) to condense to form matter in the form of quarks and bosons.  The quarks are the building blocks of proto...

Hello internet, and welcome to The Science They Don't Want You to Know.  As I have mentioned in the first post of this series, I am doing research regarding the statistical viability of currently unconfirmed conspiracies (no leaked documents) by way of currently known conspiracies (documents have been leaked).  The primary purpose of this initial research is to gather particular information, specifically how many people were involved in the actual conspiracies and the length of time which these conspiracies took place.  If you have not read the first post, you should read it here. You've probably heard of Area 51, especially if you're an American.  After all, I don't think the rest of the world has the same kind of fetish for the base and the conspiracies around it that America has, so it wouldn't surprise me in the least that Americans are more likely to have heard of this location than the rest of the world. You will no longer exist. You will never hav...

So, as you know, I have been trying to get statistical analysis of known conspiracy theories (including MK Ultra , The Tuskegee Experiment , and the NSA Spying Program ) for the series called The Science They Don't Want You to Know.  This is to perform statistical analysis on supposed conspiracies, such as global climate change, vaccines, and GMO's. In order to fully and thoroughly explain the science and stats, I need to get my hands on science behind pay walls.  And I need your help for that.  You can help by becoming Science of Life patron: go to http://www.patreon.com/thescienceoflife314 to find out how.

Hello internet, and welcome to The Science They Don't Want You to Know.  As I have mentioned in the first post of this series, I am doing research regarding the statistical viability of currently unconfirmed conspiracies (no leaked documents) by way of currently known conspiracies (documents have been leaked).  The primary purpose of this initial research is to gather particular information, specifically how many people were involved in the actual conspiracies and the length of time which these conspiracies took place.  If you have not read the first post, you should  read it here . With all of the revealed conspiracies I have covered so far in this blog, you would think that they are only performed by government agencies, that no other organization could or would pull off such acts of deceit and maliciousness.  After all, what organization has enough people who would perform actions which would fall under the category of conspiracy?  The government p...

First, I would like to apologize about this taking so long to come out; I have been trying to keep the facts accurate.  If you need a refresher on this series or just want to read from the start, begin here . There is a conspiracy going on that the news is being controlled by the powers that be right now.  In these polarizing times with polarizing spins of major news organizations (MSNBC on the left, FOX News on the right, CNN on the TMZ side), this simultaneously seems intuitive (because of course they are) and also wrong (because there's more than one single spin perpetuated by popular news).  The point of this kind of media control is a version of mind-control of the masses, though not of the same variety I've covered before on this blog. In 1973, there was a congressional hearing (that seems to be coming up a lot lately ) which showed that the CIA had bought out a variety of reporters through bribes in order to release government-sanctioned news stories to t...