The Science of Life

Hello internet, and welcome to The Science They Don't Want You to Know.  As I have mentioned in the first post of this series, I am doing research regarding the statistical viability of currently unconfirmed conspiracies (no leaked documents) by way of currently known conspiracies (documents have been leaked).  The primary purpose of this initial research is to gather particular information, specifically how many people were involved in the actual conspiracies and the length of time which these conspiracies took place.  If you have not read the first post, you should  read it here . With all of the revealed conspiracies I have covered so far in this blog, you would think that they are only performed by government agencies, that no other organization could or would pull off such acts of deceit and maliciousness.  After all, what organization has enough people who would perform actions which would fall under the category of conspiracy?  The government pays it's employees to

First, I would like to apologize about this taking so long to come out; I have been trying to keep the facts accurate.  If you need a refresher on this series or just want to read from the start, begin here . There is a conspiracy going on that the news is being controlled by the powers that be right now.  In these polarizing times with polarizing spins of major news organizations (MSNBC on the left, FOX News on the right, CNN on the TMZ side), this simultaneously seems intuitive (because of course they are) and also wrong (because there's more than one single spin perpetuated by popular news).  The point of this kind of media control is a version of mind-control of the masses, though not of the same variety I've covered before on this blog. In 1973, there was a congressional hearing (that seems to be coming up a lot lately ) which showed that the CIA had bought out a variety of reporters through bribes in order to release government-sanctioned news stories to the pub

I have been reading articles lately about how Bitcoin has little in the way of buying power outside of the internet.  There's are plenty of good reasons for this: legitimate businesses have little to no use for money which is not backed by any banking institution (which Bitcoin isn't), the value of a bitcoin is to unstable right now, the currency is too new, and bitcoin is a purely digital currency.  Sure, every well established money can be transferred digitally, but every American knows what a $1 bill in real life looks like.  Nobody knows what a bitcoin in real life looks like, because they don't exist in real life outside of computer algorithms. So what are Bitcoins and what are they good for?  First, we we have to know about digital currencies and crypto currencies.  They are related, but they are not exactly the same.   A digital currency is merely a currency which is found exclusively digitally .  The current form of credit, even though it looks

I just finished the book " The Vaccine Narrative " by Dr. Jacob Heller.  I feel it is a good idea to post a review of it on here, since it fits all of what I am trying to do with this blog.  Fair warning, if you intend to read this book without spoilers, this review does have spoilers a plenty. Dr. Heller looks at the narrative through history of the pro-vaccination side of the public argument we all know about.  He opens with the sentiment that yes, he is pro-vaccination, but he also feels the need to correct misconceptions which are prevalent in the narrative propagated by his side of the public debate.  The best way to convince those with legitimate concerns about vaccines (not those who are anti-vax conspirators, but those who have questions as a result of those conspiracy theorists) is to be completely open and honest about all aspects of vaccines, not just those aspects which are positive.  The first step in being honest to concerned parents is to be honest wit