Skip to main content

Running Total of Known Conspiracies: The Science They Don't Want You to Know

As you may very well know, I am working on developing a comprehensive set of statistics with reference to conspiracies.  The goal is to show the statistical validity of supposed conspiracies by using already leaked conspiracies.  This includes MK Ultra, the NSA PRISM Project, and Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment to name a slim few.



For those of you who want to follow along, I will be keeping track of the numbers here.  Ah yes, spreadsheets.  Useful even for conspiracies.  If you want a link to the Google Sheet, here's the link.


PostKnown ConspiracyN(t)tp-minDeviationψRun Ave pStDev
1MK Ultra20000271.3004E-062.1323E-069.999987E-010.0000013000
2NSA PRISM31000121.9193E-061.4273E-069.999980E-010.0000016530.0000004985
3Teskegee Syphilis2500406.9922E-063.5596E-069.999930E-010.0000034330.000003103











So until next time, take that as you will.
K. "Alan" Eister Δαβ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Confidence Interval: Basic Statistics Lecture Series Lecture #11

You'll remember last time , I covered hypothesis testing of proportions and the time before that , hypothesis testing of a sample with a mean and standard deviation.  This time, I'll cover the concept of confidence intervals. Confidence intervals are of the form μ 1-α ∈ (a, b) 1-α , where a and b are two numbers such that a<b, α is the significance level as covered in hypothesis testing, and μ is the actual population mean (not the sample mean). This is a the statement of there being a [(1-α)*100]% probability that the true population mean will be somewhere between a and b.  The obvious question is "How do we find a and b?".  Here, I will describe the process. Step 1. Find the Fundamental Statistics The first thing we need to find the fundamental statistics , the mean, standard deviation, and the sample size.  The sample mean is typically referred to as the point estimate by most statistics text books.  This is because the point estimate of the po...

Multiple Regression: Basic Statistics Lecture Series Lecture #14

As promised from last time , I am going to cover multiple regression analysis this time.  As mentioned last time, correlation may not imply causation, causation does imply correlation, so correlation is a necessary but insufficient (but still necessary) first step in determining causation.  Since this is a basic statistic lecture series, there is an assumption that matrix algebra is not known to students who take this course, so this section will only be working with the solutions obtained through a program such as Excel , R , SPSS , or MatLab . This is the regression case where there is more than one independent variable, or multiple independent variables, for a single dependent variable.  For example, I mentioned last time that there is a causal correlation between the number of wins a team in the MLB has and the ratio of the runs that team score to the runs that team allowed.  The more runs they scored per run they allowed, the more wins they are likely to hav...

The Connections Between the Sciences

I apologize for taking so long with this entry of my blog. I have been abnormally busy lately with my academics and poetry. Today, I am writing on how all of the sciences are related to one another, in the hopes that you will come to realize that the sciences are not as separate as popular culture and news has us believe. This blog will be geared to those individuals – weather you're the average person or a student of science, or a full blown scientist – who have the opinion that the different fields of science are completely isolated from one another. This sentiment is not true, and I hope to show the false-hood of this concept here. In physics, we have the concept of “The Right-Hand-Rule”. This pretty much determines whether the a force perpendicular to two vectors is “positive” or “negative”. Torque is a good example of this. The amount of torque placed on, say, a bolt by a crescent wrench is perpendicular to the position vector and the fo...