Skip to main content

Types of Statistical Error: Basic Statistics Lecture Series Lecture #12

As promised last time, I will cover types of statistical error this time.  Knowing the magnitude and the type of error is important to convey with any hypothesis test.  This also happens to be why, in science, it is said that nothing can ever truly be proven; only disproven.



First, it is important to understand that error typing is an integral part of hypothesis and no other part of statistics, similar to the human brain and the person it's in.  The human brain cannot fit into any other species, and it is necessary for humans to live with it.  The same concept applies with these types of errors and hypothesis; it cannot fit anywhere else, and is necessary for the success of hypothesis testing.

So what specifically is hypothesis testing?  It is the chances that the conclusion is incorrect, namely the chances of the null hypothesis is rejected when it's true (Type I Error, false positive) and the chances of failing to reject the null hypothesis when it's false (Type II Error, false negative).  In statistical hypothesis testing, the alternative hypothesis will always be a positive result.  In the case of statistical analysis, a positive result doesn't mean the same as it does in common language; it means that the result which is different than the proposed mean is the true value.

That's no baby, sir.
How would we find how big the errors would be?  For type I errors, that would be easy.  The chances are simply the level of α we've chosen to compare the p-value to.  Type II errors are are a little bit more complicated to calculate, but we've already calculated it before.  What you do is obtain the p-value, which is to calculate the difference between the sample mean and the proposed population mean, and divide it by the standard error, and obtain the p-value from the resultant z-value.  Remember from the hypothesis testing posts that the value for z is given by $z_{calc}=\frac{\overline{x}-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$.  Here's a table which contains the types of errors and their calculations:

True Statement
Null Hypothesis True Alternative Hypothesis True
Statistical Conclusion Null Hypothesis Rejected Type I Error, α Correct Decision
Null Hypothesis Not Rejected Correct Hypothesis Type II Error, p from $$z_{calc}= β = \frac{\overline{x}-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$$

So that's the types of error and how to find them.  If you have any questions, please leave a comment.  Next time, I'll start on regression analysis.  Until then, stay curious.
K. "Alan" Eister has his bacholers of Science in Chemistry. He is also a tutor for Varsity Tutors.  If you feel you need any further help on any of the topics covered, you can sign up for tutoring sessions. here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multiple Regression: Basic Statistics Lecture Series Lecture #14

As promised from last time , I am going to cover multiple regression analysis this time.  As mentioned last time, correlation may not imply causation, causation does imply correlation, so correlation is a necessary but insufficient (but still necessary) first step in determining causation.  Since this is a basic statistic lecture series, there is an assumption that matrix algebra is not known to students who take this course, so this section will only be working with the solutions obtained through a program such as Excel , R , SPSS , or MatLab . This is the regression case where there is more than one independent variable, or multiple independent variables, for a single dependent variable.  For example, I mentioned last time that there is a causal correlation between the number of wins a team in the MLB has and the ratio of the runs that team score to the runs that team allowed.  The more runs they scored per run they allowed, the more wins they are likely to hav...
Post a Comment
Read more

MKUltra: The Science They Don't Want You to Know

Hello internet, and welcome to The Science They Don't Want You to Know.  As I have mentioned in the first post of this series, I am doing research regarding the statistical viability of currently unconfirmed conspiracies (no leaked documents) by way of currently known conspiracies (documents have been leaked).  The primary purpose of this initial research is to gather particular information, specifically how many people were involved in the actual conspiracies and the length of time which these conspiracies took place.  If you have not read the first post, you should  read it here .  In today's world of the internet -- and with the modern obsession with distrust of the government -- there are  few who don't know at least of the existence of the CIA project called MK-Ultra.  For those of you who don't know, it was a project in the 50's and 60's where they attempted to develop direct mind control similar to what happened to Geordi la Forge in the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Basic Statistics Lecture #3: Normal, Binomial, and Poisson Distributions

As I have mentioned last time , the uniform continuous distribution is not the only form of continuous distribution in statistics.  As promised, here are the three most common continuous distribution types.  As a side note, all sampling distributions are relative to the algebraic mean. Normal Distribution: I think most people are familiar with the concept of a normal distribution.  If you've ever seen a bell curve, you've seen the normal distribution.  If you've begun from the first lecture of this lecture series, you've also seen the normal distribution. This type of distribution is where the data points follow a continuous curve, is non-uniform, has a mean (algebraic average) equal to the median (the exact middle value), falls from highest probability at the mean to (for all practical purposes) zero as the x-values approach $\pm \infty$, and therefor has equal number of data points to the left and to the right of the mean, and has the domain...
1 comment
Read more