Skip to main content

The Importance of Curiosity and Life


This post will be predominately geared towards two groups of people; those who are presently in college or those who are looking to go to college. I have the people that have been in my study groups in chemistry, math, and physics in mind, but this applies to everyone going to college. With all degree programs, there are two important mentalities to have while going through with it: You have to have insatiable curiosity for the subject, and you have to love the subject. Without these two frames of thought, you will make your academic and professional careers a living nightmare.
The vast majority of the students in all of my classes – this semester and in every semester for the past couple of years – have not had the curiosity required to be actually successful in these classes. Now let me stop here to explain what I mean by successful.
In my mind, successful is more than merely the grade, though don't get me wrong; the grade is a part of it. A bigger part of success in a class, in my mind anyway, is the concept of actually understanding the material in question. Having an understanding enough to be able to ask the question “How am I going to use this in my career?” and actually being able to answer that question for yourself. To follow me doing this for myself, go to my usefulness tracker.
For example, for my Associates of Science in Chemistry, I was required to take Physics 180, 181, and 182. I understand 180 because it is a prerequisite for the other two physics courses.
Physics 181 is electromagnetism, and I have answered the question of how it applies to Chemistry for myself. Chemistry is the study of turning matter into other matter. For instance, turning gasoline and oxygen into carbon dioxide and water vapor is turning matter (gasoline and oxygen) into other matter (carbon dioxide and water). Studying these interactions requires the study of how electrons flow in the system. All chemical reactions depend on electron flow. Which is, basically speaking, electric current. Used for changing matter instead of coursing through electronics, but still electric current. Because of this, the study of electromagnetism is vital to having an intimate understanding of chemistry.
Physics 182 is predominately the study of waves, thermodynamics, and fluid dynamics. If I were to not try to understand how this class applies to chemistry, than it would have been the death of me. Alas, I realized almost immediately that thermodynamics and fluid dynamics are integral to chemistry, the prior because chemistry primarily deals with the thermodynamics of molecules. The higher the energy released, the more likely it is to be spontaneous, stuff of that nature. A lot of chemical reactions also occur is a fluid state, namely liquid. Waves also are important, because of the wave mechanics of the electrons which are of vital importance to chemistry.
I also loved these classes, because of how well it allows me to study the world. I have a running joke about how science is a cruel mistress. The reason for the mistress part is because I love her, and I love how I can use her to satiate my need to study the world around me scientifically. My life would be far less interesting if I were unable to do so. This love allowed me to have a vast curiosity on the subjects.
Therefore, I consider my study of these courses to be successful, not only because of my grades in these courses, but also because of how well I was able to integrate these classes with my eventual goals and how much I liked them. These combined gave me the curiosity required to get through them and integrate them into my realm of existence successfully. I felt I had to, for the sake of the success of my career.
Now, out of the students in my classes for the past couple of years, I consider myself the second most “successful” student under the guidelines I have outlined here. The only student I have to say is more successful than I is a theoretical physics major. He is more enthusiastic about theoretical physics than I about chemistry. For those of you who know me well, you know that this is saying a lot. For those of you poets in Las Vegas familiar with some of my more science-oriented poems, you know how well versed I am in science and explaining it. This is by far THE biggest reason for how I am able to do so. Insatiable curiosity, a love for it, and asking how it will affect my life and career in a way that I will answer it for myself. This is why I consider myself successful in my course-load.
For those of you who are in college right now – or those who are making plans to go to college – it is important for you to select a degree program which you love. Otherwise, you will not be fully successful in school or in your career by the above standards. You might get high grades, or high income, but you will be unhappy and far too stressed out, not being able to figure out what some courses have to do with your field of choice until it is way too late.
If you are unable to decide weather a path is correct for you, I have this piece of advice. If you ask the question “How am I going to use this in my career?” expecting someone other then yourself to answer it for you, then you are seeking the wrong path. This mentality shows that you are not curious enough or interested enough to like the career path you are pursuing.
So, my prompt for all of you pursuing a college degree is this:
Look through the course sets for all of the possible degree programs available to you. Find the degree programs which you are least prone to the above mentality. Determine for yourself which of these degree programs are best suited for you. Namely, which of these degree programs would lead you to a most satisfying career based upon the course loads of the degrees.  This is a good prompt to use a "Lab Notebook" (see my forth post, The Importance of the Lab Notebook).

I hope you have learned something today. Until next time, don't forget to be awesome.
-K. “Alan” Eister Δαβ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Basic Statistics Lecture #3: Normal, Binomial, and Poisson Distributions

As I have mentioned last time , the uniform continuous distribution is not the only form of continuous distribution in statistics.  As promised, here are the three most common continuous distribution types.  As a side note, all sampling distributions are relative to the algebraic mean. Normal Distribution: I think most people are familiar with the concept of a normal distribution.  If you've ever seen a bell curve, you've seen the normal distribution.  If you've begun from the first lecture of this lecture series, you've also seen the normal distribution. This type of distribution is where the data points follow a continuous curve, is non-uniform, has a mean (algebraic average) equal to the median (the exact middle value), falls from highest probability at the mean to (for all practical purposes) zero as the x-values approach $\pm \infty$, and therefor has equal number of data points to the left and to the right of the mean, and has the domain of $(\pm \i

Confidence Interval: Basic Statistics Lecture Series Lecture #11

You'll remember last time , I covered hypothesis testing of proportions and the time before that , hypothesis testing of a sample with a mean and standard deviation.  This time, I'll cover the concept of confidence intervals. Confidence intervals are of the form μ 1-α ∈ (a, b) 1-α , where a and b are two numbers such that a<b, α is the significance level as covered in hypothesis testing, and μ is the actual population mean (not the sample mean). This is a the statement of there being a [(1-α)*100]% probability that the true population mean will be somewhere between a and b.  The obvious question is "How do we find a and b?".  Here, I will describe the process. Step 1. Find the Fundamental Statistics The first thing we need to find the fundamental statistics , the mean, standard deviation, and the sample size.  The sample mean is typically referred to as the point estimate by most statistics text books.  This is because the point estimate of the populati

Basic Statistics Lecture #5: Baye's Theorem

As promised last time , I am going to cover Baye's Theorem. If Tree diagram is the common name for Bayes Theorem.  Recall that conditional probability is given by $P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(A \wedge B)}{P(B)}$.   For tree diagrams, let's say that we have events A, B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , … (the reason we have multiple B's is because they all are within the same family of events) such that the events in the family of B are mutually exclusive and the sum of the probabilities of the events in the family of B are equal to 1. Then we have $$P(B_i \mid A)= \frac{P(B_i)*P(A \mid B_i)}{\sum_{m=1}^{n}[P(B_m)*P(A \mid B_m)]}$$  What this means is reliant on the tree diagram. If we are only looking at the sub-items of A, this is what the tree diagram would look like. If J has a probability of 100%, and P(C) and P(D) are not 0, then when we are trying to find the probability of any of the B's being true given that A is true, we have to set the probability of A to be the entir